Jeong Moon vs Yuzuha Negishi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 12:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Moon vs Y. Negishi

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Moon 1 - 0 Negishi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jeong Moon winning 2 and Yuzuha Negishi winning 0. The last match between Jeong Moon and Yuzuha Negishi was at the W35 Makinohara, 27-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Carpet, with Jeong Moon getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Moon | 1 |
| Negishi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Makinohara(10-27-25)
J. Moon vs Y. Negishi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.61% (35-37) | Career Total W/L | 48.39% (15-16) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Moon vs Y. Negishi Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Jeong Moon has secured 36.11% of second serve points in recent months, while Yuzuha Negishi holds a slight edge with 40.71%. Could this indicate a serving advantage for Negishi? Perhaps.
- Return Game Stats: When it comes to returning second serves, Jeong Moon narrowly surpasses Negishi with 54.51% versus 54.04%. Regarding first serve returns, Moon also leads with 38.15% compared to Negishi’s 34.52%. This suggests Moon might have a slight edge in return games.
- Under Pressure: Jeong Moon successfully defends against breakpoints 44.78% of the time, slightly better than Negishi's rate of 43.52%. Does this resilience give Moon an upper hand during critical game moments? It appears so.
- Overall Performance: Jeong Moon has won 55.00% of matches this past year compared to 45.45% for Negishi. This indicates Moon’s consistency might be a determining factor.
- Preferred Surface: Moon excels on Hard courts with a 50% win rate, whereas Negishi performs best on Indoor Hard with the same efficiency. Could the match surface impact the outcome? Quite possibly.
- Event Participation: Over the last year, Moon boasts a better winning percentage of 55.88% in lower-tier tournaments. In contrast, Negishi's success rate is only 25.00%. This suggests that Moon is more adept at capitalizing on such opportunities.
- Opponent Quality: Moon has faced players with an average rank of 306.23, while Negishi has faced tougher opponents averaging rank 252.55. Does this mean Negishi is more battle-hardened? Potentially.
- Deciding Set Performance: Should the match reach a deciding set, Moon is slightly more successful with a 46% win rate relative to Negishi’s 43%. This provides Moon a marginal edge in endurance.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing recent performance statistics and the competitive aspects between Jeong Moon and Yuzuha Negishi, several factors appear to favor Jeong Moon.
Despite both players showing strengths in specific areas, Jeong Moon leads in return effectiveness and breakpoint resilience. Moreover, Moon's overall consistency in matches and superior surface adaptability provide her a slight advantage.
While Yuzuha Negishi faces stronger opponents frequently, this experience may not outweigh Moon's robust performance metrics and winning record over the past year.
The current data suggests that Jeong Moon is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Jeong Moon vs Yuzuha Negishi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Moon vs Y. Negishi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Moon Recent Matches Played
Y. Negishi Recent Matches Played

J. Moon vs Y. Negishi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.61% (35/37) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.39% (15/16) |
| 48.19% (80/86) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.14% (33/37) |
| 49.25% (788/812) | Games Win/Loss | 46.50% (299/344) |
| 50.00% (32/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68.75% (11/5) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 11 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 76 | Total Double Faults | 79 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 272.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 289.74 |
| 68% (1573/2313) | 1st Serve % | 54% (560/1031) |
| 52% (811/1573) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (341/560) |
| 41% (305/740) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (200/471) |
| 46% (141/307) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (54/113) |
| 47% (1089/2340) | Return Points Win % | 43% (451/1043) |
| 46.43% (13/15) | Challenger W/L | 63.16% (12/7) |
| 50.00% (22/22) | Futures W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 47% (33/70) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 55% (6/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 50% (12/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 86% (35/30) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (16/12) |
| 14% (35/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (16/4) |
| 14% (37/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (15/3) |